Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Economic Development topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Board discusses home rule, branding and incentive tools to spur commercial growth
Summary
Trustees debated pursuing a home rule charter to gain tools such as tax increment financing (TIF) and urban renewal authorities, talked about hiring a business development manager, and discussed branding and property‑level risk‑reduction strategies to attract development.
Wellington trustees used the May 20 work session to discuss structural changes and incentives aimed at attracting commercial development, including home rule, tax tools and staffing.
Several trustees said pursuing a home rule charter should be a top priority. “Home rule gives us more flexibility to work with developers,” one trustee said, proposing an education and outreach campaign and noting a budget item of about $70,000 as a minimum based on other towns’ recent efforts. Trustees debated whether to target an April special election or a November ballot and asked staff to develop a calendar and outreach plan.
Trustees discussed tools available under home rule or urban renewal authorities—tax increment financing, urban renewal/DDR tools and DDA/TIF mechanisms—to reduce developer risk. One trustee described municipalities that used TIF and urban renewal to fund soil testing, environmental cleanup and other pre‑development investments that made downtown parcels viable for infill projects. Staff and trustees noted those strategies can be expensive and require clear policy decisions about whether local taxes are used to support development.
Trustees also endorsed several near‑term economic steps: hire a business development manager (staff said a draft job description is with human resources and the goal is to onboard by late summer), coordinate with the Chamber and Main Street on a ‘shop local’ campaign, and pursue property‑by‑property risk‑reduction (testing or insurance) to market vacant downtown parcels to potential developers.
Board members recommended investing in a town brand and marketing effort to support economic development and to “capture” momentum from recent projects such as the parks and Main Street initiatives. No formal motion was adopted; staff were directed to return with costs, proposed timelines and legal considerations for home rule, incentive programs and a proposed business‑development position.
