Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Billboards Signs topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Planning board approves billboard and grants variance reducing distance to residential
Summary
The planning board recommended approval of a conditional use permit for an externally illuminated static billboard adjacent to I‑57 and granted a major variance reducing the minimum setback to a nearby residential zoning district to approximately 286 feet.
Get email alerts on the Billboards Signs topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
The City of Kankakee Planning Board recommended approval of a conditional use permit for a new static, externally illuminated billboard along the I‑57 corridor and granted a major variance to reduce the required minimum setback from a residential zoning district.
Applicant Steve Hoekstra told the board the proposed billboard would match the size of an existing nearby sign, be externally lit (lights shining on the face) rather than internally illuminated, and would be leased to advertisers; the applicant said many advertisers prefer static panels. Hoekstra agreed to shift the sign 20 feet east to avoid a storm‑sewer/drainage easement. He said the sign would be electrically powered and that he would adjust lighting intensity as required.
Staff noted the zoning code requires a minimum 500‑foot separation from a residential zoning district for billboards adjacent to an interstate; the applicant requested and the board granted a major variance to allow a reduced setback (the motion and staff report noted a reduced distance near 266–286 feet; the board adopted the adjusted 286‑foot measurement in its motion). The board attached conditions including securing any required Illinois Department of Transportation (IDOT) permits, obtaining city building/sign permits, and ensuring the sign does not encroach into the storm‑sewer or drainage easement. The board also asked that the applicant coordinate any necessary photometrics or lighting controls if neighbors raise brightness complaints.
The conditional use permit and variance were recommended/granted in separate motions (CUP motion approved; variance granted by roll call). The planning board forwarded findings for both items to City Council for final action.

