Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Special Education topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Rising special-education co-op costs push Godley ISD to study bringing services in-house but lack space

3425899 · May 21, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The district's payment to the Johnson County shared-services arrangement (JCSSA) rose about 20% this year; Godley ISD currently accounts for roughly half of the coop's enrollment and faces a trade-off between higher short-term cost to remain in the coop and capital/space constraints that complicate bringing services back in-house.

Godley ISD told trustees that payments to the Johnson County shared-service arrangement (JCSSA) rose about 20% in the past year, prompting analysis of whether special-education services should be provided in‑house rather than through the coop.

Spencer, a district staff member, said the district now represents "52, 504 percent" (as stated in the packet) of the coop's enrollment and that the JCSSA payment increased from roughly $2.1 million to over $2.5 million. "We're making up more than half of that coop right now," Spencer said.

Financial and facility trade-offs: Staff reported an initial estimate that it currently costs the district about $50,000 more to remain in the coop than to provide the services in-house on a base per‑estimation. However, trustees were told the district lacks sufficient in-district space to house those students because a proposed bond did not pass. The district noted that bringing services in-house would require adding classroom and specialized space, and staff agreed to run capacity and facility-planning estimates.

Next steps: Spencer said he received updated data May 1 and that staff will prepare cost and space estimates for trustees to consider; a board member asked staff to include potential space requirements in future facility planning so the district can assess whether a future bond could address capacity needs.

Ending: No decision was made at the workshop; staff will return with analyses on cost comparisons and space needs to inform future facility and budget planning.