Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Agriculture Labor Standards topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Vermont committee reviews H.403 to extend minimum wage, add overtime and housing inspections for farmworkers
Summary
Representative Heather Supernaught introduced H.403, which would repeal the agricultural exemption from Vermont's state minimum wage, create overtime pay for agricultural workers after 60 hours a week, and require surveys and potential inspections of farm employee housing.
Get email alerts on the Agriculture Labor Standards topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Representative Heather Supernaught, sponsor of H.403, told the House Agriculture, Food Resiliency, & Forestry Committee that the bill would repeal the state exemption for agricultural workers from Vermont's minimum wage, provide overtime pay for agricultural workers after 60 hours in a week, and require a survey-and-inspection process for farm employee housing.
"This bill proposes to do three things: repeal the exemption of agricultural workers from minimum wage laws, provide overtime pay for agricultural workers, and provide inspections to determine the adequacy of farm employee housing," Representative Heather Supernaught said during the committee briefing.
Committee counsel Sophie Sedatny of the Office of Legislative Council said the measure was informed by last year’s agricultural labor study commission and by a review of state and federal law. She summarized the bill's mechanics and legal background: agricultural workers have historically been excluded from federal Fair Labor Standards Act coverage, and under current Vermont law many agricultural employees receive only the federal minimum wage rather than the state rate.
Under the bill text described by Supernaught and Sedatny, the proposal would: (1) remove the broad exclusion of agricultural workers from the definition of "employee" in Title 21 so nonfamily farm employees become eligible for the state minimum wage; (2) require time-and-a-half overtime pay for agricultural work beyond 60 hours per week (with the provision phased in by statute timing discussed in committee); and (3) require the Agency of Agriculture, Food and Markets, during its scheduled farm inspections under chapter 215 (water quality), to determine whether farm employee housing is in use and to administer a standardized survey about adequacy, availability and safety. Completed survey forms would be submitted to the Division of Fire Safety, which could decide whether to conduct a housing inspection under the Vermont Residential Rental Housing Health and Safety Code.
The bill sets an effective date of July 1, 2025, with the overtime provision staging in later (the sponsor described overtime to take effect in January 2026). Supernaught also said she wished the bill connected farm owners to the Champlain Housing Trust's Vermont farmworker housing repair loan program to help farms make housing repairs required to meet code.
Committee members asked about the 60-hour overtime threshold and where it came from. Sedatny and Supernaught said that several states that now cover agricultural overtime began with a 60-hour threshold and considered phased reductions (for example, New York’s multi‑year phase-in was cited as a model). Sedatny said the study commission reviewed state-by-state approaches and the committee report and supporting appendices are available online.
Members raised operational questions and concerns. Lawmakers and stakeholders discussed H‑2A (seasonal foreign worker) rules and pay, whether younger workers should be carved out, how room-and-board deductions operate under Department of Labor guidance, and whether farm housing inspections would make the Agency of Agriculture an "overbearing landlord." Supernaught and Sedatny repeatedly emphasized that the housing survey would be administered during scheduled agricultural inspections and that the Division of Fire Safety — not agricultural inspectors — would make any enforcement inspection and apply the residential rental housing code; employers would be given an opportunity to remedy violations before penalties apply.
Committee members also noted data gaps the study commission encountered: testimony to the commission produced differing wage ranges and conflicting pictures of how widely housing and deductions are used. Sedatny said the migrant‑justice survey and dairy‑producer testimony gave different wage ranges and that more consistent data would be useful to policy makers.
No formal motion or vote to request or refer H.403 was recorded during this briefing. Committee members indicated interest in reviewing the study commission report and in the possibility of requesting the bill for further consideration in the House general committee or the housing committee; staff said they would circulate the committee report link and materials for members to review.
The discussion combined statutory adjustments to Title 21 (minimum wage and overtime), a new chapter to authorize an Agency‑administered housing survey tied to chapter 215 inspections, and potential downstream inspections by the Division of Fire Safety under the Vermont Residential Rental Housing Health and Safety Code. The committee did not adopt any amendments, take testimony from outside witnesses during this session, or vote on the bill.
Looking ahead, committee counsel committed to distribute the study commission report and supporting appendices to members. Several lawmakers suggested the committee could formally request H.403 be moved to a committee with jurisdiction in a future session, but no formal referral or vote occurred during the meeting.

