Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Short Term Rentals topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Planning staff, applicant and commissioners debate short-term rental rules and proposed text amendments
Summary
The planning director presented two short-term rental text amendments and several special-use STR requests; the Planning Commission recommended approval in individual cases but staff flagged policy and enforcement questions that may require more detailed criteria.
Planning Director Bruce Lonnie presented two zoning items and a proposed text amendment related to short-term rentals (STRs) during the May 20 agenda session. The items included special-use requests to allow commercial short-term rental units inside existing RM developments and a text amendment to clarify parcel definition, extend the sunset period for legal nonconforming STRs and add a recovery formula.
Nut graf: The agenda exposed tensions between the Planning Department’s analysis, which highlighted potential negative impacts on long-term housing stock and neighborhood character, and Planning Commission recommendations that favored approval in several individual cases; commissioners asked staff to propose clearer criteria and enforcement measures.
Staff analysis noted the RM district’s primary intent for residential occupancy and cautioned that commercial STRs remove long-term housing units. Planning staff said the ordinance requires case-by-case special-use review and that “the cumulative effect of these commercial short term rentals was found to put stress on an already strained housing market.” Planning Commission members voted to recommend approval of specific special-use applications (two applications were described in staff presentations) but also asked staff to draft additional criteria for future STR determinations.
Applicant Alex Akins spoke in favor of two two-bedroom unit conversions in RM developments, saying the two-bedroom market is currently oversupplied and that the conversions would not affect subsidized affordable housing. Planning Director Lonnie noted that staff has processed over 100 STRs since the February 2024 ordinance and that the Planning Commission had requested additional standards and clearer notification procedures in the proposed text amendment.
Policy questions raised by commissioners included whether the current ordinance creates inconsistency across developments (one STR allowed per parcel or one per fee-simple condo unit), how to measure cumulative impacts in large complexes, and enforcement tools to address repeat violations. Commissioner comments indicated interest in a follow-up text amendment to define criteria (for example, maximum proportion of units in a development allowed as STRs) and to strengthen enforcement options.
Ending: The Planning Commission recommended approval for the items on May 1; commissioners at the May 20 meeting directed staff to return with clearer standards and to provide data such as a map of STR locations and a simpler explanation of the proposed “relief valve” in the nonconforming STR formula.
