Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Historic Preservation topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Historic‑district approvals clash with enforcement limits; Select Board and HDC seek clearer process
Summary
Members of the Historic District Commission and Select Board debated how to prevent after‑the‑fact alterations that conform to code but violate a property’s certificate of approval, and discussed performance bonds and closer coordination with building staff.
Select Board members and the Historic District Commission (HDC) last week described a recurring problem: property changes that meet building code but diverge from an HDC certificate of approval and, once installed, are difficult to remedy.
At the May 19 Select Board meeting Laurie Swede and other board members described examples including exterior electric panels and septic elements placed where they diminish historic character. Swede observed that the HDC can require landscaping or other mitigations as a condition of its approval, but that the HDC “is not an enforcement arm.”
Building Inspector Pedro Avila said that items included in a certificate of approval can be enforced in connection with building department processes: for projects requiring building permits, the town’s cloud permit workflow can flag HDC conditions and withhold final approval or a certificate of occupancy until those conditions are met. He said, however, that many of the visual concerns—like placement of panels or exposed mechanicals—are often not violations of building or safety codes, and therefore not directly enforceable as a public‑safety issue.
The HDC and board discussed possible remedies including clearer, more detailed language in certificates of approval, a requirement for a performance bond on larger projects so the town can fund corrective work if necessary, and improved pre‑permit coordination so building inspectors see HDC conditions early in the review process.
Board members requested that HDC be more explicit in conditions attached to approvals and that town staff explore whether changes to the application and approval workflow (including a stronger sign‑off step with the building department on HDC approvals) would reduce after‑the‑fact problems.
No formal change to ordinance or enforcement policy was adopted at the meeting; the board and HDC will follow up on procedure updates and the feasibility of performance bonds for projects not subject to standard building enforcement.
