Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Sunshine Law topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Council pauses after attorney’s memo flags potential Sunshine Law issues; members agree to disclose prior outside discussions on affected items
Summary
Councilors debated and briefly recessed after being told by city attorneys that earlier off‑record meetings may raise Sunshine Law concerns; council directed disclosure on agenda items with potential outside discussions and agreed to seek further legal review.
At the start of the May 19 meeting a council member raised an attorney’s memo that flagged potential Sunshine Law concerns about meetings held outside noticed public meetings. The item prompted extended discussion among council, staff and city attorneys about whether prior private discussions involving council members could jeopardize future ordinance approvals.
City legal staff described relevant case law and advised that, if a Sunshine Law violation occurred in the consideration of an ordinance, the ordinance could be subject to legal challenge and possibly voided. The attorney’s office advised that, when council reached a particular agenda item suspected of being the subject of prior off‑record discussions, those involved should disclose whether prior discussions would affect their decision and confirm they would decide based on the hearing’s evidence.
Council members disputed the allegation. One member said the meetings referenced were publicly noticed and accessible, with minutes taken, while another called the accusation “unacceptable.” The council took a short recess to allow staff to print minutes and discuss options for documenting past meetings.
Deputy Mayor Teukert and others suggested staff contact the state attorney’s office for an investigation if the council desired. After the recess the mayor directed that when topics appear that may have been discussed outside a public meeting, council members should disclose any prior discussions on the record while the item is being considered so the record will reflect decision bases. Council agreed to table any broader resolution on the issue and to pursue follow‑up with legal counsel as needed.
Why it matters: Florida’s Sunshine Law requires public bodies to make decisions in public; council members expressed concern that undisclosed off‑record discussions could expose adopted ordinances to legal challenge. The council’s approach was to require on‑the‑record disclosures when an agenda item could be implicated and to seek additional legal clarity.
