Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Council Procedure topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Irondale council debates how abstentions are recorded after consent-agenda vote
Summary
Council members questioned how abstentions were applied to a multi-item consent agenda and asked staff and legal how the record could be corrected without undoing enacted items.
Irondale City Council members spent the start of the meeting disputing how abstentions were recorded on a recent consent-agenda vote and whether individual items can be revisited.
The discussion mattered because a council member said the city clerk’s minutes showed her as abstaining on all consent items when she intended to abstain only on some. Councilwoman Cindy Cuellar said for the record, “That is that was not my intent to abstain on all of the consent agenda items. My intent was to abstain on some of them.”
Council President Spivey and legal staff explained that state and local practice treat the consent agenda as a single vote (approve or do not approve), so an abstention recorded against the consent motion applies to every item included in that single vote. Council members discussed options to correct the record or to re-vote items individually: legal counsel said the practical approach would be to pull individual items and have separate votes so each item’s outcome is explicit. Council members noted that doing so after related actions have already been implemented could be disruptive—Spivey warned that revisiting already enacted items could “mess that up.”
Councilwoman Cuellar moved to record, for the minutes, how she would have voted on specific numbered consent items; the council allowed her to state those positions for the record, but members did not reopen the prior votes on the consent agenda. Council members agreed to try to make future consent-agenda items clearer before they are voted so individual abstentions can be handled appropriately.
The meeting record shows the council then approved the minutes (with the member’s stated abstentions entered for the record) and continued the meeting without reopening the previously enacted consent items.
Why it matters: the council’s treatment of consent agendas affects the official record of how each member voted on each underlying item and can determine whether actions must be re-decided if a member intended a different stance on particular items.
