Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Code Enforcement Demolition topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
New Carlisle clarifies demolition, abatement and cost‑recovery process
Summary
Planning and code enforcement staff told the council about the legal notice and timeline required before demolishing unsafe properties, the abatement cost schedule, and the city’s ability to recover those costs via property tax assessment.
City planning and legal staff briefed the City Council on May 5 about procedures and timeframes the city must follow before demolishing blighted properties and how abatement costs are recovered.
Planning Director Mr. Moore (present at the meeting) described ongoing follow‑up on a partially burned house and the city’s attempts to contact the owner. City legal staff member Jake advised the council that the Ohio Revised Code requires a 30‑day notice before a municipality may proceed with demolition and that municipalities typically send multiple notices before taking action to avoid litigation. Jake said the 30‑day requirement is intended to ensure owners have sufficient opportunity to remedy or appeal.
Code enforcement staff explained the cost‑recovery schedule for abatements, describing a breakdown used for grass and weed abatements: $75 per man‑hour, a $250 administrative fee and a $350 disposal fee per truckload when applicable. Staff said most properties do not reach the abatement stage; this year the city had one abatement that totaled about $400 and required two people and more than one mow because of the height of the grass.
Staff also described how demolition and abatement costs are initially paid by the city and then become a lien if not paid: owners have a set period following notice (10 to 30 days in practice as described by staff) to pay; if unpaid, costs are assessed to property taxes. Staff said the community development budget currently contains funds the city can use to pay a contractor to complete a demolition, with the expectation the city will seek recovery through abatement assessment.
Why it matters: The clarification addressed residents’ questions about process, timeline and cost. Council members asked for confirmation that adequate notice and appeal rights are provided before the city moves forward, and staff confirmed the city intends to follow Ohio Revised Code timelines to reduce legal risk.
Next steps: Staff will send the next notice this week on the partially burned property and will follow the 30‑day statutory timeline if the owner does not take corrective action or file an appeal. The council asked staff to continue outreach to locate owners before abatement or demolition is scheduled.
