Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Case Outcomes Sentencing topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Multiple plea outcomes, including 3-year sentence for DWI defendant Gaspar Rodriguez, recorded in 187th District Court
Summary
The court accepted multiple plea agreements and imposed sentences during today's docket, including a 3-year prison sentence for Gaspar Rodriguez after a guilty plea to a third-or-more DWI offense and deferred-adjudication sentences in several drug and property cases.
The 187th District Court recorded several plea and sentencing outcomes during the docket. Among the matters, Gaspar Rodriguez pleaded guilty to driving while intoxicated, third-or-more (a third-degree felony in the presentation) and the court sentenced him to three years in prison with a two-year license suspension. The judge also advised Rodriguez of immigration consequences: because he is not a U.S. citizen, the court confirmed that his plea could adversely affect immigration status and reentry.
Other plea outcomes included the following case decisions the court announced on the record: Shaina Gonzales (proceeding under an Esperanza Court supervision matter) received a 235-day jail judgment satisfied under her treatment-court participation; Jose Flores received deferred adjudication with an $800 fine (probated), regular reporting and community-service conditions; Kenneth Deluze pleaded to a reduced misdemeanor protection-order contact offense, with the state recommending deferred adjudication and a $500 probated fine; Raymond Phillips received 139 days in the county jail as part of a plea agreement that included credit for time served.
Judge Stephanie Boyd took each plea, advised defendants of rights and appeal waivers, and entered sentences consistent with the plea agreements she accepted. In each case the court reviewed plea paperwork, admonishments and stipulations; where treatment courts (Esperanza) or CPS involvement existed, the court considered those program statuses when imposing sentence or restitution conditions.
These outcomes were case-specific dispositions rather than court-wide policy changes. Several matters were continued or recalled where discovery, victim contact, or additional documentation on restitution remained outstanding.
