Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Commission tables storage-container ordinance and discusses vehicle storage enforcement

January 06, 2025 | Lead, Lawrence County, South Dakota


This article was created by AI summarizing key points discussed. AI makes mistakes, so for full details and context, please refer to the video of the full meeting. Please report any errors so we can fix them. Report an error »

Commission tables storage-container ordinance and discusses vehicle storage enforcement
The Lead City Commission debated how to define and enforce rules on parking, vehicle storage and portable storage containers at its Jan. 6 meeting, then voted to table second reading of the storage-container ordinance pending Planning & Zoning review.

Why it matters: Commissioners and staff said current language in city code does not clearly distinguish short-term parking from long-term storage on public streets, which complicates enforcement and raises safety and aesthetic concerns in commercial corridors.

Chief (Public Safety) led a discussion asking for clearer terminology distinguishing parking, storage and "dead storage" on city property and streets. "If I park my car or my boat on the side of the street, am I storing it there or am I parking it there? We don't have terminology to differentiate," the chief said.

The issue surfaced around a mechanic shop on East Main where staff and several commissioners said vehicles frequently remain for more than the ordinance's 72-hour threshold. Commissioners and the chief described the difficulty of enforcing a multi-day rule: officers must photograph and timestamp vehicles, but sellers or shops frequently move cars a few feet to reset the clock.

Commissioner Rob (City Commissioner) suggested the problem spans businesses and dealerships, not a single owner, and asked for an absolute and enforceable definition so staff do not spend excessive patrol time documenting vehicles. Several speakers recommended that staff compile data on hours devoted to enforcement and a vehicle count in the troubled area before proposing an ordinance.

On a separate motion, the commission moved the second reading of ordinance 11-14-24 (storage containers) to the agenda for tabling so Planning & Zoning can review. "Shouldn't they have? No. They didn't look at it," a commissioner asked, and the commission voted to table the ordinance until planning has a chance to comment.

No fine changes or new enforcement policy were adopted at the meeting. Staff were asked to gather enforcement time and vehicle counts and return with proposed language and cost estimates for enforcement efforts.

Next steps: Planning & Zoning will review the storage-container ordinance; staff will provide counts and estimated enforcement hours for the affected area.

View the Full Meeting & All Its Details

This article offers just a summary. Unlock complete video, transcripts, and insights as a Founder Member.

Watch full, unedited meeting videos
Search every word spoken in unlimited transcripts
AI summaries & real-time alerts (all government levels)
Permanent access to expanding government content
Access Full Meeting

30-day money-back guarantee