Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the School Construction topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Racine board approves $6.601 million early bid package for Goodland Montessori construction

AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The Racine Unified School District Board of Education voted unanimously May 19 to approve a $6,601,305 early bid package for construction work at Goodland Montessori, the district said during its business meeting.

The Racine Unified School District Board of Education approved an early bid package for construction at Goodland Montessori totaling $6,601,305 at its May 19, 2025 business meeting.

Administration presented the recommendation and the board voted 8-0 to approve the early bid package. The motion to approve was made from the board dais and then seconded; the vote was recorded as eight yes votes and no dissent.

District staff presented the early-bid package as an item discussed previously at the May work session. No additional conditions or contingencies were stated on the public record at the time of the vote. Superintendent Soren Gajewski earlier in the meeting referenced recent district groundbreakings, placing the Goodland work in the context of ongoing facility projects.

Board members who voted in favor were Missus Allen; Missus Barbian; Mister Bellagio; Mister Coe; Missus Doxey; Mister O'Connell; Miss Velar; and Miss Walker Cleveland. The motion as read on the record was: “Move to approve the early bid package for construction at Goodland Montessori in the amount of $6,601,305.”

No staff or public speakers on the record opposed the package during the business meeting. The administration did not present a separate ordinance, funding resolution, or amended budget language on the record when the board took the vote; the slide attached to the meeting materials displayed the proposed total.

The board moved on to subsequent business after the vote; no implementation timeline or contractor names were announced on the record at the meeting.