Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Criminal Pleas topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Multiple defendants enter pleas; court resets for pre-sentence reports and sentencing
Summary
During the docket several defendants pleaded guilty or indicated intent to plead, with the court accepting pleas in multiple cases and resetting sentencing so probation can prepare pre-sentence reports. Agreements included deferred adjudication, probated terms and scheduled sentencing dates.
The 252nd District Court accepted guilty pleas and plea agreements in a number of cases and reset several matters for sentencing so the probation department could prepare pre‑sentence reports.
Notable pleas and agreements recorded on the docket included:
- Justin Chapa pleaded guilty to aggravated robbery (first‑degree felony). The court accepted the plea under an agreement for a 10‑year deferred adjudication, a $1,000 fine and dismissal of a related misdemeanor; sentencing was reset to allow a pre‑sentence report.
- Matthew Baxter pleaded guilty to aggravated assault against a public servant (first‑degree felony). The court accepted the plea and reset for sentencing; the agreement reflected a 10‑year deferred adjudication and a $1,000 fine pending the pre‑sentence report.
- Nicholas Gilmore Jones pleaded guilty to solicitation of prostitution (state‑jail felony). The court recognized an agreement for a two‑year state‑jail term probated for five years, a $500 fine, and reset for a pre‑sentence report.
- Daisha Mark pleaded guilty to injury to a child, elderly or disabled individual (third‑degree felony). The court accepted an agreement for an eight‑year deferred probationary term, a $500 fine, and reset sentencing to permit a pre‑sentence report.
- Rochelle Manuel pleaded guilty to aggravated assault causing serious bodily injury (second‑degree felony) and the court accepted a plea; sentencing was reset for a specified future date and the judge warned that failure to appear would void the plea agreement.
Why it matters: several pleas involved serious charges — including aggravated robbery and aggravated assault — and agreements such as deferred adjudication or probated terms that the judge said would avoid convictions on the defendants’ records if probation conditions are met. The court repeatedly ordered pre‑sentence reports before final sentencing so the judge could weigh background and supervision recommendations.
Court procedure and next steps: in each plea the court advised defendants to consult probation before leaving the courtroom and noted that the probation department would prepare or update reports ahead of sentencing. The judge reminded defendants that failing conditions of probation could lead to revocation and potential incarceration under the statutory punishment ranges.
