Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Historic Preservation Mills Act topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Commission reviews Mills Act application and rehabilitation plan for 1000 Buena Vista Street
Summary
The Cultural Heritage Commission reviewed a Mills Act contract application and a 10-year rehabilitation work plan for a 1903 Craftsman building at 1000 Buena Vista Street, finding it eligible for the contract and providing comments ahead of a recommendation to the City Council.
The Cultural Heritage Commission reviewed a Mills Act application and the applicant’s 10-year rehabilitation work plan for 1000 Buena Vista Street, a large Craftsman-era building listed on the California Register and eligible for Mills Act contract status.
Staff said the two-story, 7,158-square-foot building (built 1903) is in the Buena Vista historic district and carries a status code of 2B, making it eligible for Mills Act consideration. The rehabilitation plan submitted with the application outlines seven major tasks to be completed over a proposed ten-year contract (2025–2035): structural retrofit; chimney repairs; a complete electrical upgrade; geotechnical evaluation and stabilization of a river-rock porch retaining wall; roof repairs; re‑window rehabilitation for numerous nonoperable windows; and exterior wood repairs and rehabilitation.
Staff presented estimated fiscal figures: total estimated cost of work $610,000; estimated tax savings to the property owner over ten years $591,781; and an estimated city cost (foregone tax revenue) of approximately $153,080 over the ten-year term. Staff told the commission the application meets Mills Act eligibility criteria (location in a local district and listing on the California or National Register), and summarized the application timeline: letter of intent filed in January, formal application filed in March, and a site visit with a subcommittee on April 22.
Commissioners who visited the property praised the owners’ rehabilitation effort; Chair Lopez said a site visit confirmed the scope and that the property “is a great example” of local architecture deserving support. Staff said the commission’s role at this meeting was to provide comments and suggestions; the commission will vote at its next regular meeting to make a formal recommendation to the City Council, and the council will review the contract within the municipal code timeline (commission recommendation no later than June 30; council action no later than Sept. 30, per staff summary).
No formal recommendation to council was made at the review meeting; staff and the owners remained available to answer questions and to supply additional documentation to support the application ahead of the commission’s formal vote.
