Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Employee Benefits topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Insurer/TPA presents wellness and care‑management options; commissioners sign updated TrueScripts pharmacy agreement
Summary
A delegation from the county’s third‑party administrator and benefit partners briefed commissioners on digital physical therapy, nurse case management, a wellness platform, a Good Samaritan transition model and a near‑site clinic analysis; commissioners approved an updated pharmacy services agreement with TrueScripts.
A delegation from the county’s third‑party administrator and benefit partners briefed commissioners on multiple care‑management and wellness options on May 19 and the board approved an updated pharmacy‑services agreement with TrueScripts.
Christy Rogers of Unify (the county’s TPA partner) presented three programs aimed at lowering claims and improving population health: Sword Health, a digital physical‑therapy program that combines at‑home guided exercise with a doctor of physical therapy review; a Unified Care Connect nurse case‑management program aimed at early intervention for members with multiple chronic conditions; and Persona, a wellness platform that can integrate biometric screening, coaching and incentives. Rogers said Sword Health is offered as an engagement model that charges a vendor fee per member who enrolls (the vendor’s market price was described at about $1,000 per engaged member for an initial period, with outcome‑based payments for continued progress) and that Care Connect is a longer‑term investment in proactive case management that may show returns in years two and three.
The TPA and benefit adviser also reviewed a Good Samaritan Fund option — a voluntary program that helps high‑cost members transition off the employer plan to individual market coverage while subsidizing costs through a managed program. Staff said the vendor screens members and, in some proposals, a projected cost to move a high‑cost family to an individual plan could be approximately $55,000; commissioners asked many questions about stability, member choice and the durability of that model and requested additional details before any enrollment decision.
BlueMind, a near‑site clinic operator, presented an analysis of county claims data and a proposed near‑site clinic model for local workers. BlueMind’s conservative estimates show an initial county outlay in the first year of about $188,000 for clinic operations; the vendor’s model projects that if roughly 25% of certain eligible visits were redirected to an on‑site or near‑site clinic, the county could begin seeing six‑figure annual savings in avoided claim costs (the vendor presented a sample projected annual savings figure in the low‑hundreds of thousands at 25–35% utilization in later years).
Separately, commissioners reviewed TrueScripts’ updated pharmacy contract (which includes an international mail‑order option in addition to current domestic programs). County legal reviewed the updated contract and the board approved the agreement; the motion to sign the TrueScripts agreement passed unanimously.
Commissioners did not commit to broader program adoptions at the meeting but asked staff to pilot programs where possible, continue vendor due diligence and report outcome metrics to the board before any multi‑year financial commitments are made.
