Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Education Requirements Review topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Board reviews education requirements for LMFT and LPCC applicants

3355634 · May 16, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The California Board of Behavioral Sciences has launched a workforce-development-led review of education requirements for in-state and out-of-state licensed marriage and family therapist (LMFT) and licensed professional clinical counselor (LPCC) applicants to consider standardization of course timing, length and content.

The California Board of Behavioral Sciences said it has begun a comprehensive review of education requirements for both in-state and out-of-state applicants for licensed marriage and family therapists (LMFT) and licensed professional clinical counselors (LPCC).

Board officials said the review is being led by the workforce development committee and will assess course timing, length and content and examine whether requirements can be standardized across applicants. "The goal of this review is to establish a more consistent and equitable framework, which will reduce confusion regarding the board's education requirements," said Steve Sodergren, executive officer of the California Board of Behavioral Sciences.

The review will also consider a process for approving educational programs, officials said. At this stage, board staff described the effort as an assessment rather than a set of proposed rule changes; no specific regulatory amendments, timelines for rulemaking, or vote results were announced in the presentation.

The board did not provide a statutory citation tied to the review during the presentation. It said the workforce development committee will carry out the assessment and report back to the board as the work progresses.

Board officials encouraged schools and programs to stay engaged with the board so that questions about curriculum and eligibility for licensure can be clarified as the review continues.