Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Tourism And Events topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Committee questions tourism contractor returns after Halloweentown revenue and cost review
Summary
Members expressed concern that the city’s tourism contract and event spending returned limited general-fund dollars despite large gross event revenues; staff said $200,000 seed funding was repaid and the fund is expected to hold a modest positive balance but recommended conservative budgeting.
Budget committee members pushed staff on May 15 to seek higher returns from the city’s tourism program after reviewing the first-year results of the new event-contractor arrangement for Halloweentown and other activities.
Councilors and committee members said they were surprised that the tourism program’s gross event revenues approached $1.3 million in the prior year but that the city realized about $100,000 into the general fund after repaying $200,000 in startup funding and reinvesting proceeds into event production. Some members called for stronger contractual protections and higher direct returns to the general fund.
Staff said the tourism program’s budget is conservatively built and that the tourism fund carried an anticipated fund balance after expenses; page 59 of staff slides included a projected fund balance of roughly $106,000 after expenses for the coming cycle. Staff noted that a proposed $4.95 impact fee on event tickets would send revenues directly to the general fund and estimated roughly $127,000 annual revenue from that fee based on last year’s ticket sales.
Committee members suggested setting a higher revenue expectation for the tourism contractor, exploring reserves and surplus property sales as alternatives to household fees, and convening a tourism advisory group. No contractual action was taken; staff were asked to return with revised projections and to clarify how event revenues flow between the tourism fund and the general fund.
