Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Off Site Improvements Waiver Institutional topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Commission approves code change allowing director to grant off‑site improvement waivers for institutional sites

6026042 · October 22, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Ordinance 56-25 would let developers of institutional-zoned sites request waivers from mandatory off‑site improvements; the development services director would apply criteria including proximity to schools and continuity of sidewalks.

The Planning and Zoning Commission recommended approval Wednesday of Ordinance 56-25, which adds a process allowing developers of institutional-zoned sites to request waivers from mandatory off‑site improvements such as sidewalks, curb and gutter, alleys and similar right-of-way work.

Mike Strube, planning team coordinator, said the amendment would add discretion for the development services director to grant waivers when off‑site improvements would be isolated and unlikely to connect to similar improvements on adjacent properties. Strube listed criteria the director would consider: whether the improvement would provide continuity with similar improvements, whether the proposed use would generate pedestrian traffic, whether the site is within a half mile of a school, park or shopping center, whether multiple sides of the site lack improvements, whether the frontage is along a major street, and other relevant factors.

“Off‑site improvements are improvements that are constructed by developers at the developer’s expense in the city right of way,” Strube said. He explained institutional-zoned sites are often large, sometimes city-owned, and frequently abut residential areas; in those cases an isolated sidewalk along a city property might not connect to any future sidewalks on adjacent private parcels.

Commissioners asked whether a waiver would be denied if a site were on a route to school. Strube said that while the director is not strictly bound by the half‑mile threshold, “based on guidance... wanting sidewalks in close proximity to schools, I think it would be very unlikely that a waiver would be granted in those situations.” Commissioners also discussed the trade-off of placing discretion in one official rather than requiring council hearings for waivers.

Commissioner York moved to recommend approval; Commissioner Santore seconded. The clerk recorded six ayes, one nay (Schwartz), and the motion carried.