Limited Time Offer. Become a Founder Member Now!

Board asked finance committee to study hiring family-school collaboration specialists; five FTE previously funded but removed

October 22, 2025 | Salt Lake School District , Utah School Boards, Utah


This article was created by AI summarizing key points discussed. AI makes mistakes, so for full details and context, please refer to the video of the full meeting. Please report any errors so we can fix them. Report an error »

Board asked finance committee to study hiring family-school collaboration specialists; five FTE previously funded but removed
District staff presented a summary of family- and community-engagement strategies and requested board guidance on whether to restore dedicated family-school collaboration specialist positions. The item came during the Oct. 21 reports and discussion agenda.

Doctor Ruiz (presentation) summarized three priorities: deepen family engagement and learning partnerships, strengthen school-community partnerships and improve multilingual and multi-channel communications. The district said that in an earlier period five family-school collaboration specialist positions existed and the budgeted cost for those five FTEs was about $410,000.

Trustees also asked staff for cost estimates to expand the positions. Using current salary-and-benefits assumptions staff provided two scenarios: placing one specialist at each of the district's 22 elementary schools would cost an estimated $1.8 million annually; placing specialists at the district's 14 Title I elementary schools would cost an estimated $1.15 million. Staff said the previous five positions had been intended to rotate among schools, but that rotation had not occurred in practice.

Why it matters: Family engagement is tied to attendance, school culture and student outcomes. Board members asked for clarity on goals, metrics of success and whether to pilot different staffing models or shared positions before committing to a large-scale roll-out.

Board reaction and next steps: Trustees supported further study. Several members argued the finance committee should examine trade-offs and possible funding sources (district general fund, property-tax growth or reallocated savings) and produce recommendations. Trustees emphasized the need to define specific performance goals for any restored positions (for example, reducing chronic absenteeism, increasing family participation in SCC/PTA or increasing access to services) and to consider shared or part-time models that fit school needs.

Ending: The board directed the finance committee to study the proposal and return with options and fiscal trade-offs.

View full meeting

This article is based on a recent meeting—watch the full video and explore the complete transcript for deeper insights into the discussion.

View full meeting

Sponsors

Proudly supported by sponsors who keep Utah articles free in 2025

Excel Chiropractic
Excel Chiropractic
Scribe from Workplace AI
Scribe from Workplace AI