Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Playground Accessibility topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
West Middle students ask Hopkins board to adopt inclusive playground policy; trustees refer it to policy committee
Summary
A group of West Middle School students presented a draft district playground policy that would require inclusive features — all‑surface surfacing, at least one wheelchair‑accessible play piece, roller slides and fenced spaces — and asked the board to adopt standard design criteria. Trustees asked the policy committee to review the students’ draft.
A student group called Play For All asked the Hopkins School Board on Oct. 21 to adopt a district‑level playground policy that would set minimum accessibility standards for new or refurbished play spaces, including poured‑in‑place surfacing, at least one wheelchair‑accessible play piece, roller slides that reduce static for cochlear‑implant users, sensory panels and at least one fully fenced playground at each site.
The students — who identified themselves as eighth‑graders and members of the school’s nonprofit advisory board — described the Glenlake Elementary accessible playground they helped design and said the project used an IB design cycle: identify need, develop ideas, iterate and evaluate. The students urged the board to require a collaborative design process that includes students with disabilities, special‑education and general‑education staff, therapists, facilities and parents, and to allow a minimum of three planning committee meetings and a clear timeline for input.
The students listed specific design recommendations: a higher percentage of PIP surfacing than the ADA’s minimum path requirement, at least one slide with a transfer platform reachable from a ramp, low curb transitions, imaginative ground‑level play features, lowered basketball hoops, shaded rest areas and quiet, enclosed areas for students sensitive to the sun or crowds. They recommended roller slides to address static electricity for students with cochlear implants and said sensory and musical features should be installed at ground level.
Trustees praised the students’ work and asked staff to carry the proposal to the district’s policy committee for formal review. Vice Chair Jason Ross said he would bring the students’ draft to the policy committee, and board members suggested creating a district consulting group of students for future playground designs. The board did not adopt the policy at the meeting; directors asked staff and students to remain engaged as the committee reviews statutory, financial and intergovernmental implications.
Students said Play For All had already consulted with the Hopkins park board and had presented recommendations for the city’s Central Park plans. The board acknowledged the students’ role and encouraged them to continue offering design consulting if the policy committee or individual schools seek their input during future projects.
The presentation emphasized that more inclusive design is more costly up front, but the students said poured‑in‑place surfaces and inclusive equipment are durable and allow “everyone to play,” a phrase they used repeatedly during the presentation.
