Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Land Use Zoning topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Meriwether commissioners debate clarifying lot-size rules, ask staff to review 2‑acre standard
Summary
Commissioner Jean King urged the board to clarify ordinance language so residents can build on 2‑acre lots and to consider making 2 acres the countywide minimum to preserve rural character; staff was asked to review existing ordinance provisions about dirt roads and subdivisions and return with recommended language.
Commissioner Jean King asked the Meriwether County Board of Commissioners to direct staff to review the county's minimum-lot-size rules and report back with clarified ordinance language to preserve rural character and allow single home sites on 2‑acre tracts.
King said the current rule is widely misunderstood and that some residents believe they must own 5 acres to build on a dirt road. "I would hope you would agree that it might be in the best interest of the citizens in our county if we could get that ordinance changed," King said, arguing that a 2‑acre minimum would preserve tree cover and reduce the number of cleared rooftops if developers later bring water and sewer into rural areas.
The board discussed two separate issues: whether the county should set a 2‑acre minimum across rural areas to limit dense subdivision development, and whether the existing ordinance unintentionally prevents individual property owners on dirt roads from creating single 2‑acre house lots. Staff and several commissioners said the ordinance was intended to require larger minimum lots for subdivisions off dirt roads (to limit traffic and avoid unplanned road maintenance costs) but not to prevent an individual with an existing parcel from dividing off a 2‑acre lot for a single house.
Commissioners asked planning staff to locate the current ordinance language and return with recommended clarifications. Cassandra (staff member) and other staff members were asked to prepare the actual ordinance text for future consideration so the board can decide whether to amend minimum-lot standards for county land not served by city water or sewer.
Board members also raised related questions about driveway approvals and who inspects new driveways installed to serve multiple homes off a single frontage; public works/road department review was identified as the typical inspection authority.
No vote was taken. Staff was asked to prepare the ordinance language and background materials for a future meeting so the board could consider formal action.
