Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Retired Annuitants topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
CalPERS clarifies retired‑annuitant use: allowed for short‑term substitute work when nonretiree options exhausted, but documentation required
Summary
CalPERS staff said school employers may hire retired annuitants as substitutes for limited, demonstrable needs but cautioned against long‑term or routine use; purchasers urged documentation of recruitment efforts and start/end dates and flagged that CalPERS will enforce compliance and audit patterns of use.
CalPERS staff addressed how retired annuitants may be used in school districts and county offices, saying retired annuitants can be hired for short‑term, limited‑duration substitute roles when reasonable efforts to hire nonretiree substitutes have been exhausted, but employers must document the need and avoid routine, long‑term reliance on retirees.
“We want to clarify … substitutes can work as retired annuitants,” said CalPERS staff, but only when the hire meets statutory limits (including the 180‑day separation from retirement and a 960‑hour annual cap for retired annuitants) and when the position truly meets a limited‑duration need. CalPERS staff and membership said long‑standing practices of using retirees as permanent items in substitute pools (for example, to fill ongoing, recurring vacancies) were drawing compliance attention and audit findings.
CalPERS staff said employers should document recruitment efforts to fill positions with nonretiree substitutes and create temporary appointments with explicit start and end dates when using retired annuitants. “If for some reason while you're trying to fill those, you need to bring in some retirees in the meantime to help out, then you can,” a CalPERS presenter said, but added that employing retirees in the same role year after year without documented limited need could create compliance problems.
CalPERS staff said they will issue a circular letter clarifying retired‑annuitant rules and another about interim appointments reserved for certain higher‑level positions. Districts should expect increased scrutiny and may request guidance or provide written communications they have received from CalPERS for case review.
