Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Public Safety Aggravated Assault topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Committee debate on expanded aggravated‑assault protections exposes split; amendment fails and bill left unresolved
Summary
Lawmakers debated House Bill 956, which would add municipal employees and authorities to the list of protected persons in the aggravated‑assault statute. An amendment to add municipal authorities failed 12–14; the committee did not adopt a final vote on the bill during the session.
The House Judiciary Committee considered House Bill 956, a proposal to add employees of counties, cities, boroughs, townships and related municipal entities — and, as amended in committee debate, municipal authorities — to the list of people covered by the state’s aggravated‑assault statute.
Representative Kenyatta, sponsor of the bill, said the measure would add 23 words to the statute to extend protections to municipal workers who routinely interact with the public in high‑stress situations. “When you are assaulted in that way because of your job, people ought to be held accountable,” he said, describing testimony from municipal workers and a crossing guard who was assaulted while protecting a child.
Counsel told the committee the bill “adds employees of any county, city, borough, town, township, home‑rule municipality, optional plan municipality, or optional charter municipality to list the enumerated persons in the aggravated assault statute.” The committee considered amendment 00278, offered by Representative Sanchez, which would explicitly add municipal authorities. That amendment failed on a roll call, 12–14.
Several members who opposed the amendment and the broader bill raised questions about scope and consequences. Chairman Kaufman asked whether school employees were included; sponsor Kenyatta said some crossing guards may be municipal employees rather than school employees, illustrating jurisdictional complexities. Representative Klunk and others warned that expanding the list could greatly increase the number of people subject to enhanced penalties and urged greater study and prevention measures.
Representative Hohenstein and others said they supported the policy intent and emphasized prevention and grants to protect workers; Hohenstein said he would support the bill but urged consolidation of the long enumerated list of protected classes to avoid overly broad sentencing enhancements. Representative Kinkade argued sentencing enhancements do not prevent assaults and called for a prevention focus.
The committee did not take a final roll call to report House Bill 956 during the session. After debate and a motion discussion about tabling or pulling the bill, the chair closed consideration for the day without advancing a final committee report.
