Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Trail Signage Audible Signals topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

BPAC discusses trail signage, audible signals and safety; members cite New Mexico statute requiring bells and lights

3336130 · May 16, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

BPAC members discussed installing signage and promoting audible signals and lighting on trails to improve safety and passing etiquette, and cited a New Mexico statute requiring bells and lights for bicycles.

BPAC members spent a portion of the meeting discussing signage, audible signals and etiquette on multiuse trails after a public comment referenced concerns about passing pedestrians.

Member Gary (committee) and others said audible signals and lights are required by New Mexico law for bicycles, and they urged reminders to bicyclists to carry and use bells and lights. Member Gabriel said she wanted to be “open to any kind of signal that it appropriately notifies people that they're being passed,” noting that some pedestrians are hard of hearing and that riders calling “on your left” is not always effective.

Committee members discussed several practical measures: placing signs at trail access points to remind users that motorized vehicles are not allowed, posting guidance about passing etiquette, and considering signage that addresses headphone use or suggests courtesy speeds. Members also noted the limits of enforcement for speed on trails and recalled that legal advice in a prior e-bike resolution discouraged prescribing a strict numeric speed limit in signage because enforcement is difficult.

Committee members reported some inexpensive options exist — for example, higher-volume electronic audible devices for bikes — and encouraged a signage program that emphasizes safety and courtesy. The committee asked staff to explore sign designs and to report back on feasibility and placement.

Why it matters: Trails mix pedestrians, cyclists and other users; committee members said clearer signage and public education could reduce conflicts and improve safety. The committee emphasized inclusive messaging for deaf or hard-of-hearing users and noted that guidance, not enforcement, is likely the most practical near-term approach.