Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Charter Redistricting topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Burlington voters approved charter change letting city council redraw ward boundaries without Legislature
Summary
Burlington voters approved a charter amendment allowing the Burlington City Council to propose ward boundary changes — limited to once every five years and still subject to voter approval — removing a requirement that such changes come through the Vermont Legislature.
Get email alerts on the Charter Redistricting topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Burlington voters approved a charter amendment that will allow the Burlington City Council to propose changes to ward and council-district boundaries without sending those proposals to the Vermont Legislature, Burlington City Attorney Jessica Brown told the House Government Operations & Military Affairs Committee on May 15, 2025. “There were 9,823 ballots cast, 6,351 in favor of the redistricting charter change proposal. So that was almost 69%,” Brown said.
The amendment keeps a voter-approval step but removes the current requirement that boundary changes be enacted by the General Assembly. Under the proposed language, city council–proposed boundary changes could be made no more frequently than once every five years; any change would still require approval by Burlington voters, according to Brown and assistant city attorney Eric Ramakrishnan.
Committee members and the city attorneys framed the change as a modernization and an alignment with common municipal practice in Vermont. Brown said Burlington’s charter contains detailed legal descriptions of the city’s eight wards and four city council districts — language that dates to mid-20th-century charters and, she said, was not drafted with later U.S. Supreme Court precedent requiring equal-population districts in mind. An attorney on the panel noted that ward lines were effectively treated as permanent in older charter text and that modern practice generally leaves municipal boundary redraws to city councils or uses at-large seats.
Committee members asked how the change would work alongside development-driven population shifts. The city attorneys said the change is intended to give the council “nimbleness and flexibility” to respond to growth in specific neighborhoods, citing several downtown and North End projects, including a large new downtown building in or near Ward 3 and ongoing construction at Cambrian Rise. Ramakrishnan noted that the electorial area established pursuant to 2023 Acts and Resolves No. M7 would remain until changed under the new language.
Members also asked whether the city-level redraws would conflict with state-level redistricting for legislative seats; attorneys clarified municipal ward redraws are separate from state legislative reapportionment, which governs House and Senate district lines.
The committee did not take formal action on the charter amendment during the hearing; city attorneys answered questions and provided committee members with references to the committee minutes where the charter proposal had been discussed by Burlington’s Community Development and Neighborhood Revitalization (CDNR) committee. The representatives said they would follow up with additional testimony next week.
Why it matters: The change removes the additional legislative step that Burlington previously required to adjust ward boundaries, but preserves voter approval and places the drafting and timing control with local officials and voters. That shifts the administrative step for municipal boundary updates from the state Legislature to the local city council, within the restraints and procedures described by the city’s charter and state law.

