Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Cra Budget Amendment topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Salt Lake City CRA previews budget ‘true-up,’ flags $1.8M library accounting error
Summary
Salt Lake City Community Reinvestment Agency staff on Wednesday briefed the board on a fiscal‑year “true‑up” budget amendment that reconciles tax‑increment revenues with county receipts and corrects an accounting error that would transfer about $1.8 million back to the Salt Lake City library.
Salt Lake City Community Reinvestment Agency staff on Wednesday briefed the board on “budget amendment number 2” for fiscal 2024–25, a routine year‑end true‑up that reconciles conservative tax‑increment estimates against county receipts.
The amendment, staff said, reflects about $4.88 million in additional revenues compared with the budget proposed earlier in the fiscal year, and makes corresponding changes to legally required pass‑throughs and discretionary accounts. “Every year at this time of the year, you have a true up amendment for the budget for the community reinvestment agency,” said Kate Warep, council policy analyst.
The true‑up adjusts payments to taxing entities, tax‑increment reimbursement agreements and the affordable‑housing set‑aside. Staff said pass‑through payments to other taxing entities decreased by about $420,000; tax‑increment reimbursement agreements increased by roughly $350,000; and the affordable‑housing set‑aside rose by about $330,000. The CRA also created “transition holding accounts” to carry surplus revenue from this fiscal year into the next for planning purposes.
The briefing identified an accounting error tied to the Salt Lake City library. Staff said the county inadvertently gave to the CRA tax increment that should have gone to the library, and the amendment would allow the CRA to transfer about $1.8 million back to the library. “This budget amendment allows the CRA to, using other revenue and other expenses, transfer this money directly to the library and allow them to continue with their operations,” Warep said.
Staff noted one project area with notable change: the Central Business District experienced about a $2.4 million, or 8.7 percent, decline in tax increment for the year. A separate discrepancy involved the State Street project area, where county payments due under an interlocal agreement did not begin as scheduled; staff said the CRA amended the budget to show zero for that expected county portion and added anticipated receipts to the fiscal‑2026 budget instead.
City staff said the board will receive a public hearing and potential action on the amendment at the June 10 meeting. “There is a public hearing and potential action scheduled for this item on June 10,” Warep said.
Board members asked no substantive policy questions during the briefing; staff said most adjustments are mechanical, driven by statutory or contractual obligations and project‑area allocations.
The board did not vote on the amendment at the meeting; staff characterized the session as a presentation and the board as preparing for the public hearing next month.
