Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Board Actions topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Richland 2 board approves student appeal, adult‑education admissions, employment recommendations and two policy revisions
Summary
At its May 13 meeting the Richland 2 Board of Trustees granted a student appeal placing the student at Blythewood Academy for 90 days, approved three adult‑education admissions, accepted employment recommendations and unanimously adopted revisions to policies D.J. (purchasing) and ADF (school wellness).
During the May 13 Richland 2 Board of Trustees meeting the board voted on items discussed in executive session and on two policy revisions presented as unfinished business.
On student discipline, Mr. Dennis moved to grant the appeal for “student number 1” and to place the student at Blythewood Academy for 90 days; Mrs. Washington seconded. The board voted 6 yes, 1 no and the motion passed.
On student admissions to the district adult‑education program, Mrs. Porter moved to approve the admission requests for students numbers 1 through 3; Mr. Dennis seconded. The vote was 7 yes, 0 no and the motion passed.
On employment matters, Mrs. Washington moved to approve the employment recommendations and certified releases as presented; Mr. Trapp seconded. The vote was 7 yes, 0 no and the motion passed.
In unfinished business, the board considered two policy revisions. Mr. Dennis moved to approve the revision to policy D.J., purchasing; Ms. Williams seconded and the board voted 7 yes, 0 no to adopt the revision. Mrs. Porter moved to approve the revision to policy ADF, school wellness; Mrs. Nash seconded, and the board voted 7 yes, 0 no.
Why it matters: the actions on student appeals and placements implement outcomes from executive session and affect individual students’ placements; the employment approvals and policy revisions change district personnel and administrative guidance.
What the record shows: each motion and second were announced on the public record and voted on after returning to public session; the student‑appeal vote was not unanimous.
