Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Public Comment Education Policy topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Residents press board on proposed tax increase, low proficiency figures and equity spending during public comment
Summary
During public comment at the May 15 meeting, speakers raised concerns about a proposed 4% tax increase compounded under the Act 1 index, low student proficiency rates quoted from the Pennsylvania Department of Education, and the district's investments in equity initiatives; other speakers defended equity and special‑education supports.
Multiple residents used the public‑comment period at the May 15 board meeting to raise concerns about a proposed tax increase, student proficiency rates and district spending on equity initiatives; other commenters thanked the board for special‑education supports and defended equity work.
Jason Lanier of Lansdale asked about a proposed 4% tax increase and said his calculations showed a 14.6% increase over four years if the district follows the Act 1 index. He said proficiency rates reported from the Pennsylvania Department of Education were low in several schools and asked what taxpayers were getting for their dollars. “Why is it that we have such low proficiency rates?” Lanier asked.
During the same public‑comment period, Margaret Burke of Lansdale thanked the board for programs that supported her child with disabilities, praised the district’s capital plan and commended board member Missus McMurtry for attention to special‑education needs. Dr. Durstein (presenting as a parent) said equity and access investments improved outcomes and urged adult education to explain equity and civics to the community. A middle‑school teacher identified as Debbie described opportunities at Penbrook Middle School for students to accelerate in mathematics and said her personal observations did not match the low proficiency figures cited by a prior speaker.
Board members did not take immediate policy action during the public‑comment segment; the comments were heard before business items including the budget adoption. The superintendent and other board members acknowledged the comments and said they would continue to provide information about budget allocations and programming.
