Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Personnel Hiring topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Council authorizes background‑check vendor for new hires; attorney review required

3327358 · May 15, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The council authorized the town manager to enter into a contract for preemployment screening services (approx. $30 per screen), subject to attorney review; the vote was unanimous.

Whiteland — The council authorized the town manager to contract with a third‑party vendor to provide national preemployment screening for prospective employees, including criminal‑record searches and other checks that exceed what department staff can access internally.

Town management presented the recommendation as an outcome of an organizational review that identified gaps in hiring practices and in consistent background‑check standards across departments. Management said the vendor’s standard package was about $30 per preemployment screening and could include national sex‑offender checks, county criminal searches and credit checks where legally permitted and appropriate for the position.

Why it matters: public employers must balance candidate privacy and statutory limits on background inquiries with the town’s interest in public‑safety hiring, bonding of certain positions, and positions that require access to cash. Staff said formal vendor screening provides a consistent and auditable process and can flag out‑of‑state criminal history that local searches might miss.

Council action: the council voted 5–0 to authorize the town manager to enter an agreement with the vendor subject to attorney review and approval of the contract language.

Clarifications and limits: management and the police department explained that criminal‑justice database access held by police cannot be shared for employment screening; vendor aggregators compile publicly available records into a report usable by HR. Council members asked that the town adopt written criteria that specify which convictions or adjudications would disqualify an applicant for particular classes of positions; staff said such policy work would follow implementation of the vendor service.

Ending: the vendor authorization applies to new hires going forward; the council did not order retroactive checks of current employees.