Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Land Use And Capital Planning topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Planning staff explain school concurrency, impact fees and capital projects as growth continues

3319266 · May 15, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Volusia County Schools planning staff briefed the board on how school concurrency, impact fees and attendance‑boundary tools are used to manage enrollment growth, and presented current impact‑fee figures and upcoming capital projects to relieve overcrowding.

Volusia County Schools planning staff on Tuesday explained the district’s school concurrency program, how impact fees are set and how the district uses capital projects and attendance‑boundary adjustments to respond to growth.

What was presented: Ron Young (director of business and planning services), planning coordinator (name provided in presentation) and specialist James Roberts reviewed the district’s interlocal agreement (ILA) with municipalities, the concurrency service areas (CSAs) used to measure level of service, and recent impact‑fee and student‑generation statistics. The presentation described how the district determines whether a proposed development can be issued a certificate of school concurrency or requires mitigation (land, fees or other agreements).

Key facts and numbers: The staff noted the district’s current impact fees (adopted after the 2022 study) are roughly $7,022.70 for single‑family homes, $3,728.95 for multifamily units and $1,415.25 for mobile homes. Student generation rates from the 2022 study are 0.258 for single‑family, 0.137 for multifamily and 0.052 for mobile homes; staff said multifamily generation rates have risen since 2013 while single‑family rates fell.

Concurrency mechanics: The district uses a day‑20 membership count as the enrollment baseline for level‑of‑service calculations and distinguishes permanent school capacity (excluding portables) from temporary capacity. Concurrency service areas for elementary and middle schools match attendance boundaries; high‑school CSAs can include multiple high schools. If a CSA does not have capacity, planners consider adjacent CSAs by travel time; if none have space the developer may negotiate a proportionate‑share mitigation agreement to provide future capacity.

Capital and pipeline projects: Planning and facilities staff listed recent and upcoming projects intended to increase capacity or relieve overcrowding, including elementary and middle‑school replacements and classroom additions (examples cited: Beachside Elementary replacement, Deltona Middle replacement, Enterprise replacement planned to serve Enterprise and DeBary, Pine Ridge High School classroom addition, Pathways elementary addition, Silver Sands middle school addition). Staff also noted large planned developments (e.g., Ormond Crossings, Avalon Park phases, Deering Park) and said the department tracks reservations and projected students via a public development map on the district website.

Why it matters: The briefing emphasized that concurrency and impact fees are forward‑looking tools that require regular review (impact‑fee studies about every 4–5 years, and the ILA review cycle). Board members asked about rezoning and boundary adjustments as short‑term tools to manage utilization; staff said attendance‑boundary adjustments and targeted capital projects are used to keep schools near the district’s target level of service.

Next steps: Staff said the district will begin the next impact‑fee study process in 2026 and will continue to coordinate with municipalities, the transportation planning organization and economic development partners to align school capacity planning with housing and business growth.