Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Stormwater Detention topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Council pledges up to $60,000 to clear Brampton Hunt Phase 2 detention basin pending HOA formation

3319476 · May 15, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Council discussed long-running maintenance issues at Brampton Hunt Phase 2 detention basin and agreed to ordinance language authorizing up to $60,000 to support an initial cleanout once a homeowners association is legally established and agrees to obligations; staff will pursue developer outreach and potential assessment remedies.

The Independence City Council on May 13 discussed a decades-old maintenance problem in the Brampton Hunt Phase 2 subdivision and approved legislation authorizing up to $60,000 to fund an initial cleanout of the subdivision’s detention basin once a homeowners association is legally established and executes an agreement with the city.

Staff told council the subdivision was platted in the early 2000s but an HOA was never legally established and the detention basin that serves about 18 homes was not maintained. City staff said residents met with the city in September and verbally committed to forming an HOA; the plan presented to council would have the city either front funds or authorize payments so the basin can be cleaned and then have the HOA assume long-term maintenance responsibility once it is legally organized and, in the draft agreement, takes ownership.

Contractor J & J Enterprises provided a quote last year; because prices have changed, the resident group and staff sought updated pricing and councilmember Traicus offered to authorize up to $60,000 to provide flexibility and avoid repeated trips to council. Staff emphasized the city will not disburse funds until the HOA legally exists and executes the requisite agreement. The law department confirmed the ordinance language calls for residents to legally establish the HOA before money is released.

Council debated whether to pursue the original developer or contractor for partial responsibility. The law director advised that while staff should pursue reimbursement and contact the developer, recovering funds may be difficult and could generate legal costs; the most efficient recover mechanism available to the city would be an assessment procedure under the Ohio Revised Code if necessary. Several council members urged the law department to send an initial demand letter to the developer and to exhaust administrative avenues before expensive litigation.

Residents’ counsel and staff said community members were committed to forming and maintaining an HOA; staff reported sample HOA fees from other subdivisions ranged widely and that $200 to $400 per lot per year could provide ongoing maintenance if the HOA enforces anti-dumping practices. Council placed the ordinance on the consent agenda with the $60,000 not-to-exceed amount and directed staff to obtain updated contractor pricing, require legal HOA establishment before funds are released, and attempt recovery from the developer where merited.