Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Water Reuse topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Commissioners ask staff to study reusing detention‑pond water to help with local drought response
Summary
After commissioners discussed the idea of making water from county detention ponds available for residents and county projects, the court directed staff to research legal, regulatory and operational steps — including TCEQ requirements and possible consultant support — and report back.
Nueces County commissioners asked staff to study whether the county can provide water from detention ponds — including a London-area pond that officials described as holding roughly 6 million gallons — for local drought relief and county uses.
Commissioner Chesney introduced the idea, saying the county has water sitting in detention facilities that could help residents and nonprofit groups if legally and technically feasible. “We have a 6,000,000‑gallon detention pond in London that currently has a lot of water,” he said, pressing staff to examine whether the county can make that water available rather than letting it be released and lost.
County staff and legal counsel said the concept raises regulatory and liability questions. Public-works staff said the county already operates water‑reuse structures for its own roadwork and has a similar reuse setup at Stonegate, and that such systems would need coordination with the Texas Commission on Environmental Quality (TCEQ). The county attorney noted potential legal limits and asked for more detailed proposals.
Commissioner Hoesley and other members urged caution and recalled prior TCEQ restrictions on water movements and reuse; they said any program would need permitting, clear controls on distribution, and safeguards to prevent unintended health or environmental impacts. The court discussed whether reclamation‑district authorities would apply in other parts of the county and whether local title or ownership questions could affect distribution.
After discussion, the commissioners voted to direct staff to collect regulatory guidance from TCEQ, assess required permits and potential liability, and report back with options and a cost estimate. The court also asked staff to consider whether outside environmental or water‑management consultants should be retained to advise county officials.
