Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Landscape Trust Fund Urban Forest topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Titusville commissioners press for clearer accounting, dedicated urban-forest funding; master-plan bid due end of month
Summary
TEC members debated how landscape trust fund money has been used and urged staff to clarify whether a 50/50 split for canopy funding exists; commissioners also discussed pursuing an urban-forest manager and noted the city's urban-forest master-plan procurement is out for bid.
Commissioners at the Titusville Tree and Environmental Commission meeting pressed staff for clearer accounting of the Landscape Trust Fund and discussed dedicating more of those funds to an urban-forest program, including hiring a full‑time manager and prioritizing large shade-tree plantings.
Member Browning, who brought the item to TEC, urged that money collected from tree mitigation and landscape fees be used "mostly, if not wholly" for large canopy shade trees to support stormwater management and heat‑island mitigation. He and other commissioners said the fund has been used for gateway beautification projects and maintenance work and asked staff to confirm current policy on allocations.
"We couldn't do anything better than take whatever money we can get and devote it towards large canopy shade trees," Member Browning said. He cited an annual revenue figure discussed in the meeting of roughly $88,000 and said a dedicated urban-forest manager could be supported by those funds.
Commissioners and public speakers referenced recent council actions and grants. Lily (staff) told the commission the city received a grant agreement with the Florida Department of Environmental Protection (DEP) for $467,760 for portions of the tree-box/stormwater project and that the urban forestry master‑plan procurement is out for bid and due at the end of the month. Kaye (citizen/advocate) noted earlier council action that increased a Sorrel (Save Our Indian River Lagoon) grant line from $25,000 to $26,800 and described a downtown tree-box program planned for about 15 locations downtown; she said about half of those had been built at the time of the meeting.
Commissioners asked staff to clarify whether the previously discussed 50/50 split between canopy planting and gateway projects had been formally adopted and to provide a clear accounting of how money in the trust fund has been collected and spent, including recent gateway and tree‑box expenditures. Member Delgado urged the commission to request an audit-style account showing annual collections and expenditures so TEC could base recommendations on consistent numbers.
Commissioners discussed program elements they want included in a dedicated urban-forest program: a tree inventory or GIS map, a rapid-reforestation strategy for high‑runoff areas, public–private sponsorships, and a plan for long‑term maintenance. Several commissioners said maintenance is often underfunded and must be planned at the time of initial planting.
Lily said the city’s urban-forest master-plan solicitation is out for bid and proposals are due May 29; once a consultant is selected, the plan will include public engagement and prioritize planting on city‑owned land as guided by the 2023 urban tree canopy assessment. The commission asked staff for a timeline update and directed that the combined draft of the "native municipal tree canopy" and "landscape trust fund" documents be completed for the next TEC meeting.
No formal vote was recorded on reallocation; commissioners requested clarifying documents and scheduled follow-up reporting.
