Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Sanctuary 287g Data Sharing topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Lawmakers and ICE clash over sanctuary policies, data sharing and 287(g) expansion
Summary
Members and Acting Director Todd Lyons debated whether sanctuary policies impede public safety and ICE investigations; Lyons said local noncooperation limits information sharing and cited a 300% increase in jurisdictions joining 287(g) as part of ICE's response.
Get email alerts on the Sanctuary 287g Data Sharing topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Members of the House Appropriations Subcommittee on Homeland Security on May 14 argued about the public safety consequences of sanctuary policies and whether local noncooperation prevents ICE from tracking criminal aliens.
Rep. Henson said sanctuary policies “obstruct access to critical data and information” and “hamper our ability to track and find these individuals,” linking such limits to risks from illicit drugs and gangs. Acting Director Todd Lyons agreed that lack of access to databases such as driver records and police reports hinders ICE’s ability to locate and remove individuals with criminal histories.
Members asked how ICE handles jurisdictions that refuse detainer requests or block access to law‑enforcement databases. Lyons said ICE seeks partnerships and prefers to work with local jails, sheriffs and state corrections agencies where possible, but that high ICE detention standards can make local contracting “cost prohibitive.” He said ICE has increased participation in the 287(g) program by about 300% and welcomed more local cooperation and legislative support.
Members urged the committee to consider legislation or funding to support local partners that work with ICE and to expand information sharing so ICE can pursue criminal priorities. Lyons said coordinated task forces and partnership with local law enforcement improve public safety and agent safety.
The hearing included no formal policy change; members asked for follow‑up on where cooperation is lacking and how funding could support local partnerships.

