Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Airport Safety topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Committee approves contract to add vehicle incursion prevention system at Cleveland Hopkins

3308854 · May 15, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Cleveland’s Transportation & Mobility Committee approved an emergency ordinance authorizing the airport director to contract for a vehicle runway incursion prevention and management system, a one‑year professional services engagement priced at $70,000 with a one‑year renewal option.

CLEVELAND — The Transportation & Mobility Committee on an emergency ordinance approved the acquisition of a vehicle incursion prevention and management system for Cleveland Hopkins Airport, intended to add a digital layer of safety to airport vehicle operations.

The ordinance authorizes the director of port control to employ “professional consultants, computer software developers, or vendors” to provide an airport runway incursion prevention and management system and related services for a period of one year with a one‑year option to renew. The committee recorded the contract amount as $70,000.

Assistant Director Dennis Kramer, airport development, told the committee the system will augment existing transponders on airport equipment by adding software, in‑vehicle tablets and geofencing to track vehicles and keep them out of restricted runway areas. “This is another layer of safety that we’re looking to add to our vehicles to assure that all of them are staying in the right places,” Kramer said.

Kramer said the technology could be installed in many types of airport vehicles including large tractor mowers used near runways. The committee chair described the system as an “additional layer” on top of current operational controls and tours of the airfield.

The committee voted to approve the ordinance during the legislative portion of the meeting and asked the clerk to finalize signatures. No formal roll‑call tally was recorded in the committee transcript provided.

Committee members and staff did not identify a vendor in the public presentation, and no contract start date was given during the discussion.