Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Zoning topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Commission declines request to broaden MUCI zoning to allow major auto repair
Summary
Farmington Planning Commission discussed but did not support a proposed zoning amendment to allow major auto repair in the MUCI district after commissioners said the change could have far‑reaching effects and the property owner was not present to answer questions.
Farmington Planning Commission debated May 13 whether to amend the Mixed Use Commercial Industrial (MUCI) zoning district to allow major auto repair after a property owner sought a tenant proposal but the commission ultimately declined to pursue a code change at this time.
The issue matters because a zoning amendment would apply citywide to every MUCI parcel and commissioners said they were reluctant to make a sweeping change for a single site without further input.
Staff said property owner Barb Ackerman had proposed allowing major auto repair at her property at the northeast corner of Pilot Knob Road and County Road 50 (transcript: "5465 200 and Twelfth Street West"). The site consists of three buildings leased to various businesses; one building is currently vacant. Staff read the zoning definition of major auto repair from the code as "general repair, rebuilding, reconditioning of engines, motor vehicles, or trailers, including bodywork, framework, welding, and major painting services." Under current code, staff noted, major auto repair is a conditional use only in B2 (downtown business), B3 (general business) and the Spruce Street mixed use district (where the use must be confined within the interior of a principal building). Amending MUCI to allow this use would affect all parcels zoned MUCI.
Tony, chair of the commission, opened the discussion and commissioners recalled an earlier, in‑depth discussion about auto‑related businesses when the code was last updated. Several commissioners—Mitch, Andy, Krista and others—said they preferred to retain the existing restrictions and not broaden MUCI uses without the applicant present to explain the proposal. Staff confirmed the owner was likely in Arizona and not present at the meeting.
Commissioners cited past problems with auto‑related uses on MUCI parcels and recommended caution. "Changing the zoning might change a lot of different properties in Farmington," one commissioner said. Another observed that the proposed use "doesn't fit" the existing permitted uses in the district and recommended not adding the use at this time.
Tony said no formal motion was required after the discussion; the commission expressed a consensus to not change the code at this time. Staff will not proceed with an amendment absent further direction from the commission or additional information from the property owner.
