Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the School Program Cuts topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Parkrose public commenter urges reversal of proposed high-school choir cut; district cites $75,000 staffing savings and $3 million shortfall
Summary
A Portland State choral volunteer urged the Parkrose budget committee to retain the high school choir program; district leaders said the choir position would save about $75,000 but acknowledged the cut would remove a key source of belonging for roughly 30 students and said they will seek alternatives if possible.
A Parkrose budget committee public commenter urged the district to reconsider a proposed cut to the high school choir program, telling the committee the elimination would remove a primary source of community and belonging for many students.
"This is gonna remove their main source of community, belonging," said Apollo Firmway, a Portland State University student, choral music educator and volunteer with the choir program, during the meeting’s public-comment period. He said many choir students do not play another instrument and that removing the program would limit their access to music.
District leaders told the committee the choir reduction was part of deeper staffing cuts needed to close an operating shortfall. Superintendent Michael Lopes and budget staff described a roughly $3 million budget gap and said the choir position represents about $75,000 in annual savings if cut. Staff said they prioritized protecting elementary classroom positions and that cuts fell heavily on Parkrose High School because of declining enrollment there.
The superintendent acknowledged the emotional impact of cutting arts programs and said staff have explored alternatives, including use of savings, transfers and negotiated concessions to avoid cuts where possible. He added the district negotiated with the teachers’ union on professional development days, and that a concession on one professional-development day saved another teaching position elsewhere in the district.
Committee members and district staff said they would continue to seek options — such as targeted fundraising, grants, temporary staffing arrangements or legislative relief — but cautioned that many funding tools are restricted, that restoring a cut is difficult, and that additional state revenue would be required to guarantee program reinstatement.
Public discussion and committee members’ remarks emphasized the district’s broader funding challenges: declining enrollment, failed local levies and limits in state funding formulas. Several committee members encouraged public advocacy and noted the district will monitor pending state legislation and the upcoming revenue forecast for potential new resources.
The district did not announce an immediate reversal of the choir reduction at the meeting.
