Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Fleet Facility Site Selection topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Residents, officials debate potential fleet facility sites; Cherry Street, Cleveland Avenue discussed
Summary
The Wausau Infrastructure and Facilities Committee received updates on possible locations for a new fleet maintenance facility and heard public opposition to using Cleveland Avenue. Staff outlined site evaluations including a narrow parcel on Single Avenue, 901 Cherry Street, and possible expansion near the DPW.
City staff updated the Infrastructure and Facilities Committee on May 8 about potential sites for a proposed fleet maintenance facility and heard public comment opposing further industrial use of Cleveland Avenue.
Public comment opened with Terry Killian, who identified himself as the alderperson for District 3, saying Cleveland Avenue is zoned residential and has a history of industrial and environmental issues. Killian told the committee: "That site is zoned residential and is surrounded by residential properties. It is an area that has long endured multiple types of industry and environmentally related issues. Public input related to Cleveland Avenue and its usage has been extensive and there has been strong opposition to any further industrialization of this location." He also said the council previously voted in 2021 to remove Cleveland Avenue from the feasibility study.
City staff reported several site reviews and ongoing conversations. A staff presenter said a property on Single Avenue was evaluated but found "narrow" and unsuitable for required turning movements and building layouts. The presenter reported a separate parcel at 901 Cherry Street could be workable if property owners were willing to sell or reconfigure an adjacent parking lot. Staff also said some property owners near the Department of Public Works have contacted the city about potential sales to expand DPW property.
Development Director Pfeiffer told the committee the city is working to balance long-term riverfront development goals with the practical need to find a location for the facility. Pfeiffer said: "Obviously, they're not making any more riverfront property out there. We've been trying to assist Eric and his team in trying to find a location for that. Unfortunately, there's not a whole lot of locations that meet his size requirements." He said acquisition of riverfront parcels is an option the city is pursuing because it could both serve the facility and advance riverfront trail and redevelopment goals.
Committee members debated trade-offs. Alderman Veil said he supports moving forward with Cherry Street because suitable alternatives are limited. Alderman Neal and others emphasized the city's long-term goal of removing industrial uses from the riverfront and urged continued outreach for alternatives. No formal site decision or vote occurred; staff said discussions and outreach to property owners will continue and that the matter may return for future action.
Committee direction: staff will continue site evaluations, return to the council and finance committee as needed, and pursue outreach with property owners for 901 Cherry Street and other candidate sites.
Ending: The committee received the update and closed the item with no formal action. Staff indicated further public engagement and additional site reports will be provided to the committee as options are vetted.
