Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Land Use Wetlands topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Planning board approves conditional use permit for wetland‑buffer work at 2 Shady Lane; forwards Strafford appointment to council

AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The Somersworth Planning Board approved a conditional use permit allowing construction of a single‑family home and related site work within the riparian wetland buffer at 2 Shady Lane, granted a waiver from the high‑intensity soil survey requirement, and voted to recommend a Strafford Regional Planning Commission appointment to city council.

The Somersworth Planning Board on a voice vote approved a conditional use permit (CUP) for construction of a single‑family home, driveway and utilities that will impact 21,389 square feet of the Riparian Wetland Buffer District at 2 Shady Lane (Map 21, Lot 148).

The permit was requested by property owners Eric and Sherry Detflor and presented by Joe Berry of Berry Surveying. Director Mears summarized staff and Conservation Commission review and said the Conservation Commission recommended approval after a special meeting. The board also approved a waiver from the site‑plan rule requiring a high‑intensity soil survey and moved that the application did not have regional impact. The board voted to forward a separate appointment — Mark Richardson to the Strafford Regional Planning Commission — to the City Council with a favorable recommendation.

Why it matters: The permit allows development in a regulated wetland buffer that the city and Conservation Commission oversee. Staff conditioned final approval on documentation and construction controls intended to reduce erosion and protect downstream resources, and the project will require state wetlands permitting before a certificate of occupancy can be issued.

Board and staff said the revised plan reduces environmental risk compared with the prior approval for the lot. Joe Berry, representing the applicants, described design changes and erosion controls and said the revised house location “is further away from the wetlands than was previously approved” and that the plan includes a “double layer of protection for the wetlands around the entire construction site.” He read the CUP criteria into the record, saying the proposal is consistent with the district’s purpose to protect surface waters and wetlands.

Board members who spoke during the public hearing and deliberation said the submission improved on an earlier approval and corrected existing erosion. Jeremy Rhodes, Planning Board member, said the proposed culvert and runoff controls “corrects a lot of that” erosion and that the plan “reduces impact” compared with the prior approval. Jason Berry, Planning Board member, said the lot already had substantial disturbance and proposed one minor condition: showing a half‑percent slope on the culvert grade to prevent water ponding on the west side of the driveway.

Director Mears read the conditions that must be met before final approval, including that the final plan bear the stamp and signature of a licensed land surveyor and a licensed wetland scientist, that all federal and state permits (including a New Hampshire Department of Environmental Services wetlands permit) be obtained, and that a foundation certification survey be submitted prior to issuance of a certificate of occupancy. Additional conditions and requirements to be met during construction include placement of permanent marker signs noting the current 50‑foot wetland buffer (to be provided by the city at the applicant’s cost), a culvert grade showing the half‑percent slope toward the wetlands, permits and approvals from the Department of Public Works (driveway permit, utility pole license, trench permits), sleeve and inspection requirements for the waterline through the foundation, and presence of Water Division staff during waterline installation and backfill.

The board also approved the applicant’s request for a waiver from “section 9.1.b.6” of the site plan review regulations that would ordinarily require a high‑intensity soil survey; the applicant argued that NRCS mapping (Hinkley‑Lomi sand identified on plans) and the small, single‑family scope do not warrant a full high‑intensity survey typically used for larger subdivisions.

Votes at a glance: - Motion to accept the application as complete: moved by Chris Horton, seconded by Jeremy Rhodes — accepted by vote (recorded by voice). - Motion finding no regional impact: moved by Chris Horton, seconded by Jeremy Rhodes — passed by voice vote. - Motion to approve the waiver from section 9.1.b.6 (high‑intensity soil survey): moved by Jeremy Rhodes, seconded by Chris Horton — approved by voice vote. - Motion to approve the conditional use permit for Eric and Sherry Detflor at 2 Shady Lane with the conditions read by Director Mears: moved by Jeremy Rhodes, seconded by Joe Berry (Berry Surveying) — motion passed by voice vote. - Motion to recommend Mark Richardson to the Strafford Regional Planning Commission and forward to City Council: moved by Chris Horton, seconded by Ken Vincent — passed by voice vote.

What the board emphasized: The board repeatedly contrasted this revised proposal with a prior CUP for the lot (previous permit cited as CCUP 052022 in the record) and said the current design moves the house farther from wetlands and re‑routes the driveway away from a utility easement. Several members noted the lot had been previously clear‑cut and disturbed before the current owners purchased it in 2024.

Remaining approvals: The applicant must secure all required federal and state permits, including the NHDES wetlands permit, and must satisfy the listed plan revisions and construction conditions before a certificate of occupancy will be issued.

Next steps: With the Planning Board’s recommendation, the appointment of Mark Richardson will be considered by the Somersworth City Council; the property owners must obtain state and city permits and provide the required final plans and certifications to the Planning Department before construction may proceed.

(Reporting based on Planning Board meeting minutes and hearing record.)