Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Subdivision Approvals topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Area plan commission approves multiple subdivision plats; conditions set for health and road permits
Summary
The commission approved several subdivision petitions, including Rector Place, Manly 1 Lot, WallaceBuilders and Batson replat of Lot 3, generally subject to health department soil borings, driveway/roadcut permits and stormwater/drainage requirements where applicable.
Get email alerts on the Subdivision Approvals topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
The Vigo County Area Plan Commission approved four subdivision petitions during the meeting, with staff conditions addressing health department approvals, driveway permits and drainage or stormwater plans where required.
Rector Place (docket 26, file 162025) was recommended favorably by staff with conditions: health-department soil borings must be submitted for each proposed lot because public sewer is not available, and county road driveway/roadcut permits will be required to access the road-right-of-way. Staff noted the four new lots exceed minimum size requirements and that a favorable recommendation was offered with the conditions.
The Manly 1 Lot subdivision (docket 24, file 142025) was approved after staff noted an updated plat and a minor correction to an ownername in the materials. Staff reported public water and sewer are not available, no flood-zone concerns exist, and that stormwater drainage review is not required for a minor subdivision; the approval was contingent on filing the revised plat.
A major subdivision by Wallace Builders (docket 25, file 152025) creating four lots on about 2.84 acres was approved conditionally. Staff required a drainage and erosion-control plan because the proposal qualifies as a major subdivision; the plan must document alley-vacation evidence and utility treatment in the alley, and bonding for infrastructure may be required. Attorney Richard Shagley, representing Wallace Building Contractors, said an easement will be left for utilities and reported that an alley vacation filing had been submitted the same day.
The Batson replat of Lot 3 (docket 23, file 132025) was recommended favorably with conditions: recorded plat within 90 days and health-department approval (soil borings) because public sewer is not available. Staff requested a waiver from major-subdivision requirements in favor of minor subdivision procedures given lot size and intended use; the commission approved the waiver and the plat subject to the recorded conditions.
Staff and several petitioners emphasized that subdivision approval creates lots but does not, by itself, authorize construction; building permits and any drainage or road approvals must be obtained separately.
Why it matters: Approvals clear the way for property owners to legally divide parcels for future homesteads or development, but staff conditions underscore that health and road authorities must still review soil and access permits before building occurs.
What happens next: Petitioners must satisfy staff conditions including health-department soil borings, road/drive permits and recorded plats; major-subdivision applicants must provide drainage/erosion-control plans and evidence of alley vacation or utilities treatment before infrastructure work begins.

