Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Committee Procedures And Hud Contingency topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Committee discusses calendar, H.461 straw poll timing and contingency planning for HUD‑matched programs

3251408 · May 9, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Members reviewed procedural timing for taking a straw poll on H.461 once it clears the Senate, discussed House concurrence procedures, and asked staff to inventory state programs that depend on HUD matching funds for contingency planning.

The committee reviewed procedural timing and next steps for pending legislation and budget contingencies. Members said House Bill H.461 is expected to clear the Senate pending a technical correction; the committee discussed when to take a nonbinding straw poll on whether to concur if the Senate returns the bill with changes.

Committee staff explained the procedural mechanics: if the Senate acts on third reading but does not suspend reconsideration rules, the Senate will not messenger the bill to the House until a full day has passed; that timing affects when the House can place the bill on its notice calendar and hold a concurrence vote. Members concluded the committee could likely hold a straw poll later the same day the bill is messaged to the House and planned to do so in the afternoon if the bill arrives.

Separately, members asked staff to identify state programs that require HUD matching funds and to consider drafting contingency options so programs are not disabled entirely if federal funding changes. The committee discussed adding a statutory “or” allowing programs that currently only operate if HUD matching funds are available to accept alternate funding sources in an emergency; staff were asked to consult relevant housing agencies and reporting committees before recommending language.

No concurrence vote on H.461 occurred during the meeting and no formal legislative amendment was finalized; staff will coordinate timing and technical follow‑up.