Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Single Serve Alcohol topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Aldermen debate single-serve alcohol restrictions for downtown
Summary
Kankakee aldermen revisited a previous restriction on single-serve alcohol sales in the downtown area, with some members saying the rule has limited effect on public drinking and others urging support for social services instead of stricter sales bans.
KANKAKEE, Ill. — Members of the Kankakee City License and Franchise Committee revisited a downtown restriction on single-serve alcoholic beverage sales at their most recent meeting, debating whether limits on single cans have reduced public drinking or only shifted the problem.
Committee members said the downtown restriction—originally adopted about two years ago—prohibits sales of alcohol in packaging that differs from what is supplied by distributors. "I don't think that's the solution to our problem," Alderman Victor said of banning single cans, adding that people determined to drink will find other ways and that the city should prioritize connecting people to services. "We have to find some way to get them some type of help," he said.
The discussion reviewed enforcement and local business impacts. One alderman said downtown businesses were already working around single-serve rules by bundling cans or using plastic rings to form multipacks, and asked whether the ordinance should explicitly ban any outside repackaging or require a minimum package size. A second alderman noted the ordinance was already modified to restrict sales "outside of the packaging that came from directly [from] the distributor," and that distributors supply products in a range of pack sizes.
Committee members did not move to rescind the restriction. Instead, they characterized the rule as an initial step and questioned its effectiveness in reducing public drinking. Several aldermen said enforcement and outreach to people with chronic public-drinking issues matter more than further tightening sales rules. The committee left the item on its agenda for continued monitoring and declined to take immediate additional regulatory action.
The committee also noted possible business effects: one alderman said a liquor store in his ward has a "for sale" sign and attributed part of that owner’s difficulty to recent regulatory changes. No formal motion to change the ordinance or to adopt a different packaging requirement was made during the meeting.
The committee did not take a vote on new penalties or additional packaging rules; members asked staff to keep the issue on future agendas and monitor downtown conditions.
