Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Digital Advertising Children topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Senate passes bill critics called unconstitutional censorship of online ads for children
Summary
House Bill 2195, a measure authorizing the Attorney General broad authority to deem certain apps directed at children and restrict advertising content, passed the Senate despite objections that it would amount to government censorship; supporters framed it as protecting children from inappropriate advertising.
The Arizona Senate passed House Bill 2195 on May 7, 2025, a measure that drew a sharp floor objection from at least one senator who called it “unconstitutional government censorship.” The sponsor and the Senate voted to pass the bill and the secretary was instructed to transmit it to the House.
Senator Ortiz rose to explain her vote, calling HB 2195 “unconstitutional government censorship” and saying the bill gives the attorney general broad authority to deem applications or websites as directed, in part, to children — a determination that could allow the attorney general to censor ads, previews and other content on platforms such as YouTube, Netflix and gaming consoles. Ortiz said the bill’s practical effect “will allow the government to censor content including ads, movie previews, game previews, and game demos on apps like YouTube, Netflix, Playstation, or Xbox” if the attorney general determines the application is directed to children.
Supporters argued the measure targets advertising directed at children and is aimed at preventing harmful or age-inappropriate marketing. Opponents warned the language was overly broad and raised free-speech and constitutional concerns. After debate and a roll call, the presiding officer announced the result as having passed; the transcript records “You've passed House Bill 21 95. Sign it up in session.”
Why it matters: the bill shapes state-level authority over digital platforms and advertising directed at minors and raises questions about the balance between child-protection and free-speech safeguards.
Action: HB 2195 passed the Senate and will be transmitted to the House (or to the governor per usual placement); opponents flagged constitutional concerns on the floor and urged caution.
(Ending) The measure’s passage sets up further review as it proceeds to the next step; civil-liberties groups and industry stakeholders are likely to monitor implementation closely.
