Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Native Corporations Reinstatement topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Committee weighs bill to allow reinstatement of Native village corporations beyond two‑year deadline
Summary
The House Community and Regional Affairs Committee heard testimony May 8 on House Bill 126, which would let Alaska Native village corporations that were involuntarily dissolved be reinstated at any time, overriding a current two‑year administrative deadline. Committee set the bill aside with an amendment deadline of noon May 12.
Get email alerts on the Native Corporations Reinstatement topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
The House Community and Regional Affairs Committee on May 8 in Juneau heard testimony on House Bill 126, which would allow Alaska Native village corporations that were involuntarily dissolved to be reinstated at any time, notwithstanding a current two‑year administrative reinstatement deadline.
Supporters told the committee the change is aimed at protecting land and other assets held collectively under the Alaska Native Claims Settlement Act (ANCSA) when small, rural village corporations lapse after paperwork or staffing problems. "House Bill 126 is a new version of a fairly routine bill, reinstating native corporations once they've been involuntarily dissolved," said Paula Boldstaff, presenting the bill on behalf of Representative Foster.
The measure would retain the standard administrative window — roughly nine months until involuntary dissolution and a two‑year window for general corporate reinstatement — but add language allowing the Division of Corporations to reinstate Native village corporations beyond that two‑year period. "So this is saying, notwithstanding that 2 year limit for native village corporations, the department can reinstate them at any time," said Sylvain Raab, director of the Division of Corporations, Business and Professional Licensing, describing the department's reading of the redrafted language.
Committee members pressed for scope and data. Counsel and department staff told the panel the bill is written to apply to village corporations specifically, not regional corporations, because village corporations typically hold land and other non‑fungible assets granted under ANCSA that cannot be redistributed to individual shareholders the way ordinary corporate assets often are. Committee counsel said that between February 2010 and February 2018 there were 19 Native village corporations involuntarily dissolved, a figure offered to illustrate the issue's scale.
Department officials said statewide corporate records show broad administrative dissolution activity: "In fiscal year 24, there were 6,441 corporations of all types that were administratively dissolved. And during that same fiscal year, there were 604 that were reinstated," Raab said, and added that the agency did not have readily available, specific counts isolating village corporations that lapsed beyond two years.
Testimony from village leaders emphasized community impacts. Richard Ochsendor, identified in testimony as a village corporation president and CEO, described the proposal as a tool to preserve a village corporation's ability to use collective assets for projects such as energy and housing.
The committee closed public testimony and set the bill aside with an amendment deadline of noon Monday, May 12. No formal vote was recorded at the May 8 meeting.
