Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Housing topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Senator pushes to restore $8 million to rural and middle‑income workforce housing funds; amendment withdrawn for further talks
Summary
Senator Mike Hallstrom proposed restoring $8 million to state workforce housing funds on the floor — $4 million to the Rural Workforce Housing Fund and $4 million to the Middle‑Income Workforce Housing Fund — but withdrew the amendment for additional negotiation after floor debate about priorities and limited general funds.
Senator Mike Hallstrom offered AM 12‑94 on the floor to restore $8 million that the Appropriations Committee had proposed to remove from two workforce housing programs — $4 million from the Rural Workforce Housing Fund and $4 million from the Middle‑Income Workforce Housing Fund.
What proponents said: Hallstrom described the rural workforce fund as a high‑return program that helps communities build affordable workforce housing in Greater Nebraska; he noted prior state infusions plus local match produced roughly 1,400 units after two major funding rounds and provided examples of projects that leveraged state dollars to attract private and other public investment. Hallstrom argued restoring the funds preserved momentum for vetted projects with submitted applications and a strong application demand list.
Committee/Chair response and fiscal context: Senator Clements, chair of Appropriations, said the package had redistributed limited resources across more than 75 state agencies and argued the committee had already left $8.5 million of funding in the rural program after the committee sweep; he also said university and other agencies had experienced similar proportional reductions. Clements warned that restoring the full request would cut deeper elsewhere.
Amendment status: Facing prolonged debate, Hallstrom later withdrew AM 12‑94 to continue negotiations with Chair Clements and other members; he said the committee chair was open to additional discussion and that he would refile or pursue the issue on select file if a consensus path could be found.
Why it matters: The rural and middle‑income workforce housing funds are targeted tools designed to leverage public and private investment for housing in communities that otherwise lack market responses; proponents said the programs produce significant local leverage and have been used statewide. Opponents said the timing — amid a budget shortfall — required shared sacrifices across many programs.
Ending: The floor debate left the question open; Hallstrom withdrew the amendment to continue talks with the Appropriations Committee and said he would refile the measure or seek a select‑file solution later.
