Judge denies early probation termination but eases supervision and waives fees
Loading...
Summary
A defendant who sought early termination of probation was denied, but the judge reduced urine-analysis frequency, allowed reporting by mail/email, and waived supervisory fees after reviewing prior criminal history and probation compliance.
During a docket call in the 187th District Court, Judge Stephanie Boyd denied a defendant’s request for early termination of probation but modified supervision to reduce reporting burdens.
The judge said she reviewed the defendant’s completion of probation requirements and probation’s recommendation for early termination but remained concerned about the defendant’s prior criminal history. Boyd declined to end the probation early, saying she was not “inclined to terminate you early” given the record, but she offered relief by allowing the defendant to report by mail and by reducing the frequency of required urine analysis from monthly to once every three months.
The judge also waived supervisory fees that would have otherwise continued to accrue. The defendant had completed many probation requirements; the judge acknowledged that but emphasized the totality of the defendant’s criminal record when denying early termination. The modification—reporting by mail with quarterly UAs and waived supervisory fees—was put in place immediately.
The court instructed the defendant to retain mailed or emailed proof of reporting in case of later disputes, and the probation officer will provide the defendant details on how to submit required cards and how the reporting process will work.
No new sentencing or changes to the underlying conviction were made; the court’s action altered only the terms and mechanics of supervision.
