Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Education Curriculum topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
House Education Committee advances bill to require cursive instruction
Summary
The House Education Committee unanimously reported House Bill 17, which would amend the School Code to require instruction in cursive handwriting (or "joint italics") at the appropriate grade levels, with supporters citing literacy and access to historical documents as reasons.
Get email alerts on the Education Curriculum topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
At a voting meeting of the House Education Committee, members unanimously voted to report House Bill 17 to the full House. The bill would amend the School Code to require instruction in cursive handwriting or what the bill describes as "joint italics" at the appropriate grade levels.
Representative Ouattro, the bill sponsor, told the committee the measure is meant to ensure “that all Pennsylvania students learn how to write and read cursive,” and argued that the skill helps students access historical documents and practical tasks such as endorsing checks. She listed several founding documents, saying cursive literacy helps students “access and comprehend key historical sources such as the Declaration of Independence, the U.S. Constitution and the Bill of Rights.”
The bill sponsor also told the committee that at least 24 states have laws requiring cursive instruction, and said the requirement is a modest, practical addition to the curriculum intended to support both historical literacy and everyday tasks.
Committee members did not record a roll-call vote on the bill; the chair reported unanimous committee adoption and that the measure will be reported as committed to the next stage.
Why it matters: supporters framed the change as a way to preserve access to primary historical materials and to teach a manual skill that some members said remains useful in adulthood. The measure is procedural: it amends the School Code to add a required instructional element and does not itself detail funding or implementation steps.
The committee did not debate an implementation timeline or specific grade-by-grade expectations during the meeting; those items would be settled later if the bill moves forward on the floor.

