Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Vermont superintendents tell House panel PCB testing, abatement costs are straining districts
Summary
Two superintendents told the House Education Committee that current PCB testing rules, unclear state funding and expensive abatement needs have forced districts to spend local funds, relocate programs and defer construction projects while leaving questions about long-term monitoring and reimbursements.
Two Vermont superintendents told the House Education Committee on May 8 that polychlorinated biphenyl (PCB) contamination found in several school buildings has created immediate safety, program and budget challenges for districts and that current state testing and funding arrangements leave them shouldering large, uncertain costs.
Katie Sutton, superintendent of the Hartford School District, told the committee that testing last year found two schools at “the school action and immediate action levels,” forcing relocation of three programs and off-campus placement of the culinary arts program. "We've spent, $424,662.49 out of our local budget," Sutton said, saying Hartford has not received state reimbursement under the current model and is still weighing how to use a locally approved bond for capital work amid the contamination.
Sutton said bulk-sample testing shows PCBs in source materials such as adhesives, caulk and paint and that the chemical has permeated concrete walls ‘‘between 1 to 5 inches’’ in some locations. She told lawmakers that, in her district's experience, air sampling alone under Act 74 can understate the scope of contamination because readings vary with ventilation, temperature…
Already have an account? Log in
Subscribe to keep reading
Unlock the rest of this article — and every article on Citizen Portal.
- Unlimited articles
- AI-powered breakdowns of topics, speakers, decisions, and budgets
- Instant alerts when your location has a new meeting
- Follow topics and more locations
- 1,000 AI Insights / month, plus AI Chat

