Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Future Land Use Change topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Commissioners table future‑land‑use change for Richard’s Chapel Road parcel after staff briefing

3238610 · May 8, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The Board of Commissioners voted to table a future‑land‑use map amendment (FLU25‑000003) that would allow the 18.43‑acre parcel off Richard’s Chapel Road to be redesignated and later rezoned to permit three single‑family lots; staff said the change is a down‑zoning relative to the existing zoning but tabled to allow additional review.

The Newton County Board of Commissioners voted to table for 60 days a proposed future‑land‑use map amendment (FLU25‑000003) for an 18.43‑acre parcel on Richard’s Chapel Road that the applicant seeks to divide into three single‑family lots.

Development services staff described the request as an amendment from the current “RES” residential classification to “RR” rural residential, enabling a future rezoning to AR (agricultural‑residential) so the applicant may subdivide into three lots, two of which would be flag lots under the proposed configuration. The staff report noted that the parcel’s irregular shape and proposed flag‑lot configuration are not allowed under current R‑2 zoning without a rezoning and potential BZA variances for flag‑lot length.

Surveyor and petitioner representative John Brewer told the board the request is effectively a down‑zoning from potential higher R‑2 density and that the applicant has owned the property for 20 years. Commissioners asked technical questions about driveways, road frontage and the mechanics of the two‑step process (FLU amendment followed by rezoning and, if necessary, BZA variance for flag lot length).

Concerns raised in debate included policy consistency with the county’s Unified Development Ordinance and the role of flag lots in the county; Commissioner Long said flag lots are “never a good thing” in his view and urged caution when amending the future‑land‑use map.

Outcome: Commissioner Henderson moved and the board unanimously voted to table FLU25‑000003 for 60 days to allow additional review and for staff to provide clarifying materials and updated survey information.