Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Student Devices topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
School board advances cell‑phone limits after hours of debate over bell‑to‑bell ban
Summary
The Fairbanks North Star Borough School Board advanced a draft policy on personal electronic devices to a second reading after heated debate over an all‑day ban. The administration warned that enforcing a bell‑to‑bell ban would be impractical without extra resources; public testimony was sharply divided.
Get email alerts on the Student Devices topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
The Fairbanks North Star Borough School Board voted to send a draft policy limiting students' personal electronic devices to a second reading, setting up a final decision at the board's next meeting.
The policy would regulate cell phones, smart watches, earbuds and similar devices; it would direct administrators to adopt implementing procedures that vary by grade band. Board President Burnett said the policy is intended to improve the learning environment and student well‑being.
Board members debated whether to require an all‑day, bell‑to‑bell ban for all grade levels or leave discretion to principals. "If we're thinking of making this accessible to a novice ... having it in a really clear space, I don't think hurts us," said Missus Doolian, urging specific language. Miss Carol Hubbard pushed for a strict ban across K–12, saying research shows restricting devices improves attention and mental health.
Administration and several board members urged caution. Superintendent Dr. Meinert told the board that enforcing a full bell‑to‑bell ban, especially at high schools during lunch, would be difficult with current staffing: "It is impossible to collectively monitor and ensure the requirements are being followed if we allow a ban at lunchtime," he said, citing large high‑school populations and limited supervisors.
Students and community members also testified. Student representative Inka Shannon said students want restrictions but worry about safety and the ability to contact family in emergencies: "In an emergency situation, they want to be able to tell their parents. They wanna be able to tell their loved ones, 'Hey, I'm okay.'"
Public commenters were mixed. Audra Hull told the board counselors she consulted support a bell‑to‑bell ban. Board debate reflected the split: some members favored a bold, uniform ban; others favored district standards plus principal discretion and a phased implementation with supports.
After discussion the motion to advance the policy passed on a roll call vote that recorded five votes in favor and three opposed. The policy will return for a second reading; the administration said it will also post a draft administrative regulation describing grade‑band procedures and exceptions for medical or translation needs.
The board asked administration to provide more implementation details and any financing options — for example, device‑secure pouches used by some districts — before the second reading.
Board members and staff said they plan additional outreach before the next meeting to collect input from families and building principals.

